SpinkillerAI — AI-Powered Fact-Checker

Find the Quote. Expose the Spin. SpinkillerAI is an AI-powered fact-checking platform for investigating public figures and verifying statements against primary sources.

Spin Tracker

Enter any public figure's name and a topic. SpinkillerAI searches verified quotes, speeches, interviews, and voting records to surface position changes, flip-flops, and contradictions — with direct source citations and a shareable dossier.

Start a Spin Tracker investigation — free

Claim Tracker

Paste any claim or statistic. SpinkillerAI fact-checks it against government data, peer-reviewed research, and established reporting — returning a verdict (True, Mostly True, Misleading, False, or Unverifiable), a confidence score, and a permanent shareable link.

Check a statement — free

Non-Partisan Analysis

SpinkillerAI applies identical analytical scrutiny regardless of the political direction of the claim. All outputs use neutral attribution language and work only from documented evidence.

Examples

Browse completed Spin Tracker dossiers across a range of public figures and topics.

View example investigations

Privacy and Data Handling

Statements and searches submitted to SpinkillerAI are processed by AI to generate fact-check results. See our privacy policy for full details on data handling.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use

Marco Rubio said sanctions will be imposed on businesses or individual transacting with the International Criminal Court

Mostly True

Attribution: Confirmed. Confirmed. Multiple passages attribute to Rubio the statement, “We will ban transactions with this rogue court,” on Friday/Oct. 9, 2026, which substantially matches saying sanctions would be imposed on businesses or individuals transacting with the ICC. Reporting also says the sanctions restrict transactions by U.S. individuals and businesses involving the court. Qualification: the sourced wording is a paraphrase match, not the exact words in the assertion, and some activity had a six-month wind-down/exemptions. Verdict confidence: 92/100. Direct attribution is strong: Rubio is quoted saying, "We will ban transactions with this rogue court," and reporting specifies the measures ban/restrict transactions by US entities, businesses, and individuals with the ICC. Limitation: the assertion paraphrases sanctions language and omits grace-period/exemption details. (Rubio: ‘Either the ICC will end its threats, or we will end ...; US unveils sanctions on ICC in move court condemns as ...; Why is the US sanctioning the International Criminal Court? | Israel-Palestine conflict News | Al Jazeera) Method: verdict-evidence-v1. Not a calibrated probability. Accuracy: Mostly True. Mostly True. The order and OFAC materials establish a current legal basis under which some ICC-related dealings are sanctionable: blocked persons include foreign persons providing goods or services to support covered ICC actions, and OFAC says some ICC transactions are "otherwise prohibited" absent licenses (Imposing Sanctions on the International Criminal Court; International Criminal Court-Related Sanctions | Office of Foreign Assets Control; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL). But the claim is too broad: not all businesses or individuals transacting with the ICC are automatically sanctioned; several categories are expressly licensed through April 7, 2027 (DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL). Verdict confidence: 86/100. The excerpts show a live sanctions framework: certain foreign persons providing goods, services, or support tied to covered ICC actions can be blocked, and some ICC transactions are licensed only because they otherwise would be prohibited (Imposing Sanctions on the International Criminal Court; International Criminal Court-Related Sanctions | Office of Foreign Assets Control). But broad licensed exceptions undermine any blanket reading (DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL). Method: verdict-evidence-v1. Not a calibrated probability.