SpinkillerAI — AI-Powered Fact-Checker

Find the Quote. Expose the Spin. SpinkillerAI is an AI-powered fact-checking platform for investigating public figures and verifying statements against primary sources.

Spin Tracker

Enter any public figure's name and a topic. SpinkillerAI searches verified quotes, speeches, interviews, and voting records to surface position changes, flip-flops, and contradictions — with direct source citations and a shareable dossier.

Start a Spin Tracker investigation — free

Claim Tracker

Paste any claim or statistic. SpinkillerAI fact-checks it against government data, peer-reviewed research, and established reporting — returning a verdict (True, Mostly True, Misleading, False, or Unverifiable), a confidence score, and a permanent shareable link.

Check a statement — free

Non-Partisan Analysis

SpinkillerAI applies identical analytical scrutiny regardless of the political direction of the claim. All outputs use neutral attribution language and work only from documented evidence.

Examples

Browse completed Spin Tracker dossiers across a range of public figures and topics.

View example investigations

Privacy and Data Handling

Statements and searches submitted to SpinkillerAI are processed by AI to generate fact-check results. See our privacy policy for full details on data handling.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use

The companies that build AI are responsible for their products safety and making sure they operate within the law

Provisional assessment

Confidence not measured.

Accuracy: True. The excerpts support a general responsibility claim. Under generally applicable product liability/safety law, AI/software is treated as a product and AI providers typically qualify as manufacturers liable for safety defects and legal non-compliance (S3P1-S3P4). Under the EU AI Act, providers of general-purpose AI models have current legal obligations, including documentation, copyright compliance, and for systemic-risk models, steps to ensure safety and security (S2P1-S2P6). A proposed U.S. framework also describes developer safety duties, but the core claim is already supported by current law and rules.